by Pam
Dave Perry is recognized worldwide as an authority and expert the Racing Rules of Sailing. When I reached out to Dave for his assistance, I was pleasantly surprised by his willingness to go above and beyond in his reply as well as his willingness to continue the dialogue with answers to numerous follow up questions. Many thanks to Dave for taking the time to provide us with his interpretation of RRS 43.1(a) and 43.1(b) as well as sharing some
insights into the history and purpose of these rules.
For more on the rules, get Dave Perry’s two books Understanding the Racing Rules of
Sailing through 2016 (which
includes the complete rule book) and Dave
Perry’s 100 Best Racing Rules Quizzes available
at US Sailing, 800 US SAIL-1, or www.ussailing.org.
Posted with permission of Dave Perry:
I am happy to give you my personal opinions on the hypothetical
questions you sent me. These are solely
my personal opinions.
Rules
43.1(a) and 43.1(b) are independent rules which address two separate issues
dealing with the wearing of clothing and equipment when racing.
Rules
43.1(a) is a stand-alone requirement. It clearly states that competitors are
not allowed to wear or carry any clothing or equipment with the purpose or
intent of increasing their weight. In other words, if part of the reason the
person wore something was to increase their weight, that breaks rule
43.1(a)...period. This has nothing to do with the overall weight limit
described in 43.1(b).
Rule
43.1(b) begins "Furthermore...", which means "in addition to the
requirement in rule 43.1(a)..." Nothing in rule 43.1(b) is an exception to
the clear requirement in rule 43.1(a).
Rule
43.1(b) puts a maximum weight on all clothing and equipment. The clothing and
equipment referred to in rule 43.1(b) is clothing and equipment worn for
purposes other than increasing the weight of the sailor (which is banned
completely by rule 43.1(a)).
The
history of 43.1(a) is that for a long time (up through 1972) sailors, such as
Finn sailors, increased their body weight by wearing extra weight in the form
of sweat shirts and other water absorbing garments that, when wet, would weigh
up to 100 pounds. In 1973, the IYRU (former ISAF) decided that was unhealthy
due to back and knee injuries, and instituted rule 22.3(a) (a ban on wearing
clothing and equipment for the purpose of increasing weight) which was word for
word the same as current rule 43.1(a). But then they added rule 22.3(b) which
said “A class which desires to make an exception to rule 22.3(a) may do
so, but the total weight of the clothing and equipment cannot exceed 20 kilos.
The racing rules continued this way (prohibiting the wearing of clothing and
equipment for the purpose of increasing weight, but allowing it *if* the class
rules allowed it) but shifted the maximum weight down to 15kg, unless the class
stated a lesser or greater weight, in which case the max weight was set at 20
kilos.
I
was part of the first Laser generation (first hull was #931) that wore water
bottles in the 70’s when we raced. I think the Laser class max was set at 10
kilos (which was basically two water bottles, a t-shirt, a PFD, pair of shorts,
watch, socks and Aigle boots). My back is now permanently injured with two
degenerated discs.
In
1997, ISAF completely banned the wearing of clothing and equipment for the
purpose of increasing the sailor's weight, again for health reasons. That ban
is currently rule 43.1(a). The way they completely banned it was to remove from
the rule the exception clause that had been in the book from 1973-1996
which allowed the classes to permit the wearing of clothing and equipment for
the purpose of increasing weight. Note that rule 43 cannot be changed by class
rules or the sailing instructions (see rule 86.1).
The answers to your four Cases therefore
are (and this is without studying the current Laser class rules other than what
you quote in your blog, which I read in its entirety):
Hypothetical
Facts
Case
1:
Sailor A
wears an additional shirt that has been specifically
designed to allow for the insertion of lead weights and weights are inserted,
however, the total weight of Sailor A's clothing is 7.5 kg, as measured
according to Appendix H, which was strategically
calculated to be just below the 8 kg limit imposed by RRS 43.1(b). Is Sailor A
in violation of 43.1(a)?
Case
2:
Sailor A
wears an additional shirt that is heavy when wet solely for the purpose of adding
weight, however, the total weight of Sailor A's clothing is 7 kg, as measured according to
Appendix H, which is well
below the 8 kg limit imposed
by 43.1(b). Is Sailor A in violation of 43.1(a)?
Case
3:
Sailor A
wears an additional shirt that is heavy when wet for the primary purpose of warmth with the added benefit that it also adds additional weight,
however, the total weight of Sailor A's clothing is 4 kg, as measured according to
Appendix H, which is well
below the 8 kg limit imposed
by 43.1(b). Is Sailor A in violation of 43.1(a)?
Case
4:
Sailor A,
due to financial limitations, wears technical
sailing gear that is old and
outdated and made of heavier materials, therefore the total weight of Sailor
A's clothing is 8.5 kg as measured according to Appendix H,
which is in violation of the 8
kg limit imposed by 43.1(b).
Is Sailor A in violation of 43.1(a)?
Case
1 - yes, because the purpose of wearing the clothing and equipment is to
increase the sailor's weight.
Case
2 - yes, for same reason as Case 1.
Case
4 - clearly the sailor breaks 43.1(b) unless the class rules permit a higher
weight or the sailor is on a boat required to be equipped with lifelines (see
rule 43.1(c)). Whether they also break 43.1(a) depends on the reason they wore
that gear.
Case
3 - this is the tricky one, because it becomes a gray area between wearing a
garment for warmth or protection, and wearing it for the purpose of adding
weight. Setting aside the issue that some people will try to take advantage of
this gray area by "saying" the gear was for warmth or protection but
"knowing truthfully" that they are wearing it to increase their
weight, the answer to whether Sailor A is breaking rule 43.1(a) is in the
truthful answer to this question: why did the sailor choose to wear that
garment?
Case
89 is the only ISAF Case on this, and stemmed from a situation in, I believe,
the 1996 Olympics where a top finishing 470 crew, I believe, was wearing a
camelback garment with a water bottle inserted, with a drinking tube attached.
The crew was protested for breaking rule 61.1(a) (equivalent to rule 43.1(a) in
the current book). The crew claimed the purpose of wearing the garment was to
provide hydration during the race which otherwise was very difficult as the
crew was on the wire most the race. The protestor claimed the purpose of
wearing the garment was to increase the sailor's weight. The Jury could not
bring itself to DSQ the boat, but soon after the Games, Case 89 was published,
with the intent to ban the wearing of clothing or equipment that had the effect
of increasing the sailor's weight when it was not otherwise necessary to wear
that garment. ISAF's opinion was that crews could find a way to put a water
bottle in the boat and get drinks from it during the race without wearing it. ISAF
also realized that windsurfers could not realistically drink water while racing
unless wearing it, so they are allowed to, by exception to the rule in their
Appendix B.
Case
89
Question:
Does rule 43.1(a) permit a competitor to wear or otherwise attach to his person
a beverage container while racing?
Answer:
No. Except on a windsurfer or a kiteboard, there is no necessity for such a
practice, and therefore its primary purpose must be considered to be to
increase the competitor’s weight. (Note that rules B4 and F4 modify rule
43.1(a) for windsurfing competition and kiteboard racing.)
So back to your Case 3, if the sailor truthfully wore the extra layer
so their weight would be increased, then they broke 43.1(a). But if it was
necessary for them to wear the extra layer to stay warm, and the additional
weight of the extra garment increased their weight, that to me doesn't break
rule 43.1(a). But, if they intentionally wear that extra layer on the outside
of their other gear, and they let it get soaked such that it increases their
weight when they could have worn it inside a waterproof spray top, etc., then
I'd be more inclined to say the sailor wore that extra layer for the purpose of
increasing their weight, and broke rule 43.1(a). Otherwise they would have made
the effort to keep that layer dry in order to stay warmer.
***
The Case 3 grey area causes me concern. It seems that two sailors could be wearing the exact same clothing but for different reasons and one would be legal and the other illegal. So ... following a suggestion by Dave, I joined the Scuttlebutt Sailing Club (an organization that is a member of US Sailing) and have asked them to submit a revised set of hypotheticals to US Sailing for an official interpretation. Not only is anyone seeking membership with Scuttlebutt automatically accepted, but membership is free. My kind of sailing club. And when I asked them if they'd be willing to submit the hypotheticals to the US Sailing Appeals Committee on my behalf, they immediately agreed to help. To be continued ...
