by Pam
Dear Laser sailors, ILCA, and Performance Sailcraft Australia:
You
have until June 2, 2017 to file an opposition with the U.S. Trademark
Office to stop Velum Ltd. from being granted the exclusive right to use
the Laser starburst mark in connection with the services below:
Organization
of sports competitions; Organizing and conducting sporting events for
the purpose of helping high school seniors earn a college scholarship in
their respective sport; Organizing and conducting college sport
competitions and athletic events; Organizing, arranging, and conducting
sailing events; Organizing, conducting and operating sailing
tournaments; Instruction in the nature of sailing clinics; Instruction
in the nature of sailing lessons; Organizing and conducting college
sport competitions and athletic events; Organizing and conducting
sporting events for the purpose of helping high school seniors earn a
college scholarship in their respective sport; Organizing and conducting
sporting events for the purpose of helping high school seniors earn a
college scholarship in their respective sport; Providing information
relating to organizing community sporting and cultural activities,
contests and games; Providing information relating to the organizing of
educational, cultural, sporting, or entertainment exhibitions; Providing
news and information via an Internet web site in the field of
competitive sailing
On December 28, 2016, Velum, Ltd.
applied for registration of the US service mark on the Laser starburst
design. It has been approved and was published for opposition on May 2,
2017.
|
Publication for purposes of Opposition |
According to the US Trademark Office, "Any party who
believes it will be damaged by the registration of the mark may file a
notice of opposition (or extension of time therefor) with the Trademark
Trial and Appeal Board. If no party files an opposition or extension
request within thirty (30) days after the publication date, then eleven
(11) weeks after the publication date a certificate of registration
should issue."
Background
Karaya (Jersey) Limited
and Velum, Ltd. are the most recent owners of the trademarks for the
word LASER as well as the Laser starburst design. That right has
historically been limited to the use of the mark in connection with
goods, like sailboats, etc. They never acquired the right to use the
mark in connection with the provision of services, like running
regattas. Or more specifically, the exclusive right to use the mark in
connection with organizing, conducting and operating sailing tournamements. As we
all know, that right has historically been assumed to be owned by the
ILCA and, by extension, the members of the ILCA.
So what
happens if Mr. Farzad Rastegar (the man behind the shell companies)
successfully obtains the exclusive right to use the Laser mark in
connection with running regattas? We can only speculate. He is a
businessman after all and not a sailor. I would assume he is obtaining
the mark for the purpose of making money. He already uses the offshore
companies to license the use of the mark to Laser Performance, then
shifts that income stream offshore for tax purposes. Being able to
collect licensing fees from the ILCA, or its members, every time they have a Laser regatta seems like an income stream to me and would seem a
logical conclusion to draw as to his intent. Of course, he might be of
a more benevolent mind and he might just be trying to secure the
mark to make sure no one can come along and hold the ILCA hostage while
demanding they change fundamental rules to suit one side over another,
or that they relinquish their patents on the Mark II sail, or that
all big events be run in one builder's territory and and not another, or
some other such mischief.
So, what can you, the ILCA,
members of the ILCA, or PSA do about this? If ever there was a
time to pay an attorney to protect your rights, it is now.
Where should they look? Well, for starters, I would certainly ask for a qualified legal opinion, on the following:
2.
Look up the term Collective Trademark because the ILCA and, by
extension, its members, would appear to possibly have a priority claim of use of the mark
in connection with regattas. A win of a collective trademark for the ILCA might also lead to being able to unravel some of the other LASER trademark registrations in the US.
3. Look at the
ownership chain of title for the existing LASER trademarks. There are
some breaks and the true owner may not be Velum at all. There may even be a possibility to claim that the LASER mark has effectively been abandoned for years. An opposition filed by
the ILCA to this latest registration attempt might turn out to uncover a bigger problem and ultimately shift ownership of
all the LASER marks in the US to the ILCA.
4. Look at Velum's
previous attempts to register the service mark in the US and at Bruce Kirby's oppositions to the registrations. One of the oppositions is still
pending which I assume prompted them to refile this recent application
using a different specimen, trying a slightly different spin. Velum argues that it has already licensed the trademark to the ILCA and then extensively detailed the ILCA's control over the entire Laser game. Is there such a license?
5. Oh, and PSA, when you look at the Kirby oppositions you will find that the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has already ruled that the agreement signed previously, which prevented Kirby from ever contesting the marks, does not apply to this newly claimed use of the mark for services. It's fair game. If the ILCA won't
defend their right to the mark under a collective trademark or otherwise, then there
may be angles PSA can exploit to claim a right in the service mark in the US.
Lastly, those of you in the EU. Might already be time to bend over. The service mark in the EU was filed at the same time, has already gone through the opposition period, and a registration certificate was issued on April 12, 2017. I wonder if the ILCA has already received a cease and desist letter asking them to pay a licensing fee to run Laser regattas in the EU. Does any of this have a connection in why the charter fee is so steep for the Master Worlds in Croatia this year? Surely not.